<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>1475-2859-7-19</ui>
   <ji>1475-2859</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Research</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Maintenance metabolism and carbon fluxes in <it>Bacillus</it> species</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1">
               <snm>T&#228;nnler</snm>
               <fnm>Simon</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>taennler@imsb.biol.ethz.ch</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A2">
               <snm>Decasper</snm>
               <fnm>Seraina</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>seraina.decasper@usz.ch</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A3" ca="yes">
               <snm>Sauer</snm>
               <fnm>Uwe</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>sauer@imsb.biol.ethz.ch</email>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Microbial Cell Factories</source>
         <issn>1475-2859</issn>
         <pubdate>2008</pubdate>
         <volume>7</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <fpage>19</fpage>
         <url>http://www.microbialcellfactories.com/content/7/1/19</url>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubidlist>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">18564406</pubid>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1475-2859-7-19</pubid>
            </pubidlist>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <rec>
            <date>
               <day>18</day>
               <month>4</month>
               <year>2008</year>
            </date>
         </rec>
         <acc>
            <date>
               <day>18</day>
               <month>6</month>
               <year>2008</year>
            </date>
         </acc>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>18</day>
               <month>6</month>
               <year>2008</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
      <cpyrt>
         <year>2008</year>
         <collab>T&#228;nnler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab>
         <note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note>
      </cpyrt>
      <abs>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Abstract</p>
            </st>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Background</p>
               </st>
               <p>Selection of an appropriate host organism is crucial for the economic success of biotechnological processes. A generally important selection criterion is a low maintenance energy metabolism to reduce non-productive consumption of substrate. We here investigated, whether various bacilli that are closely related to <it>Bacillus subtilis </it>are potential riboflavin production hosts with low maintenance metabolism.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Results</p>
               </st>
               <p>While <it>B. subtilis </it>exhibited indeed the highest maintenance energy coefficient, <it>B. licheniformis </it>and <it>B. amyloliquefaciens </it>exhibited only statistically insignificantly reduced maintenance metabolism. Both <it>B. pumilus </it>and <it>B. subtilis </it>(natto) exhibited irregular growth patterns under glucose limitation such that the maintenance metabolism could not be determined. The sole exception with significantly reduced maintenance energy requirements was the <it>B. licheniformis </it>strain T380B. The frequently used <it>spo0A </it>mutation significantly increased the maintenance metabolism of <it>B. subtilis</it>.</p>
               <p>At the level of <sup>13</sup>C-detected intracellular fluxes, all investigated bacilli exhibited a significant flux through the pentose phosphate pathway, a prerequisite for efficient riboflavin production. Different from all other species, <it>B. subtilis </it>featured high respiratory tricarboxylic acid cycle fluxes in batch and chemostat cultures. In particular under glucose-limited conditions, this led to significant excess formation of NADPH of <it>B. subtilis</it>, while anabolic consumption was rather balanced with catabolic NADPH formation in the other bacilli.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Conclusion</p>
               </st>
               <p>Despite its successful commercial production of riboflavin, <it>B. subtilis </it>does not seem to be the optimal cell factory from a bioenergetic point of view. The best choice of the investigated strains is the sporulation-deficient <it>B. licheniformis </it>T380B strain. Beside a low maintenance energy coefficient, this strain grows robustly under different conditions and exhibits only moderate acetate overflow, hence making it a promising production host for biochemicals and riboflavin in particular.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
      </abs>
   </fm>
   <meta>
      <classifications>
         <classification type="bmc" subtype="user_supplied_xml" id="endnote"/>
      </classifications>
   </meta>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Background</p>
         </st>
         <p>Optimal choice of the host organism for cell factory engineering is pivotal to the economic success of biotechnological processes. Typical host selection criteria are available genetic tools and methods, safety status, genome annotation, well-characterized process characteristics and scale-up behavior. For many products, in particular for bulk chemicals, cellular energetics is another key criterion whose impact becomes most relevant in near optimized processes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>. In particular in the frequently employed fed-batch processes, where the production phase is prolonged by controlled feeding of the growth-limiting substrate, cells are placed in the domain of slow growth <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp>. During this phase, cells devote increasing percentages of the consumed energy substrate not only for growth and product formation, but also for maintaining cellular homeostasis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>. The relevant physiological parameter is the maintenance energy coefficient that specifies the amount of energy cells required for maintaining homeostasis in the absence of growth <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr></abbrgrp>. For optimal design of fed-batch processes with extended slow-growth conditions, choice of cell factories with appropriate cellular energetics and low maintenance energy coefficient thus becomes increasingly relevant <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>An important class of industrial production hosts are the gram-positive bacilli as efficient secretors of enzymes and producers of antibiotics, purine nucleotides or vitamins. The industrially and scientifically most relevant representative of this group is <it>B. subtilis</it>, which is used extensively for enzyme and biochemicals production <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp>, in particular for the large-scale production of vitamin B<sub>2</sub>, riboflavin <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>. While <it>B. subtilis </it>fulfills most of the industrially desirable host criteria, it does not have a particularly low maintenance energy coefficient (0.44 mmol g<sup>-1 </sup>h<sup>-1 </sup><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>) when compared to, for example, <it>B. licheniformis </it>(0.24 mmol g<sup>-1 </sup>h<sup>-1 </sup><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp>) or <it>Klebsiella aerogenes </it>(0.3 mmol g<sup>-1 </sup>h<sup>-1 </sup><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>). Another industrially undesired feature of <it>B. subtilis </it>is its ability to form spores upon nutrient limitation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr></abbrgrp>. To prevent sporulation during production, typically the first regulatory sporulation gene, <it>spo0A</it>, is deleted. Beyond sporulation, however, the Spo0A protein regulates several other cellular processes, and the <it>spo0A </it>mutation has been implied to increase the maintenance energy coefficient of riboflavin producing <it>B. subtilis </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>. Here, we investigate specifically whether the <it>spo0A </it>mutation causes indeed increased maintenance demands.</p>
         <p>Another important host characteristic is the distribution of intracellular fluxes as the starting point for metabolic engineering. For the production of riboflavin &#8211; synthesized from three pentose units, glycerin and two C1 units &#8211; significant fluxes through the oxidative pentose phosphate (PP) pathway deem intuitively advantageous <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp>. While significant catabolic fluxes through the PP pathway are found in common lab strains of <it>Escherichia coli</it>, <it>B. subtilis </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr></abbrgrp>, <it>B. clausii </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp> and <it>B. megaterium </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>, many other bacteria exhibit exceptionally low PP pathway fluxes that only match the anabolic demand <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr></abbrgrp>. Partly related to the PP pathway flux, catabolic NADPH overproduction is another preferred host property because 3 NADPH are required per riboflavin molecule, and catabolic overproduction could be utilized for riboflavin biosynthesis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp>. To assess the potential of close <it>B. subtilis </it>relatives as alternative riboflavin cell factories, we quantified their distribution of fluxes as well as NADPH and maintenance metabolism. Specifically we focus on the growth rate-dependent flux distribution in glucose-limited chemostat cultures because of their similarity to the conditions during riboflavin production in fed-batch with continuously decreasing growth rates.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Methods</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Bioreactors</p>
            </st>
            <p>A recently described mini-scale chemostat setup was used for parallel operation of 12 chemostats <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp>. Briefly, bacteria were grown in sealed 17 ml Hungate tubes. To avoid stepwise feeding by dripping medium, the feed needle was placed directly in the culture liquid. The culture volume was kept constant at 10 ml by level control with a second needle placed at the desired level to suck off excessive culture broth. The medium removal pump was set to a speed of two culture volumes per minute, thereby also removing air from the headspace. The resulting underpressure caused air influx through a third needle, which was placed at the bottom of the reactor. The rising bubbles both aerated and mixed the cultures.</p>
            <p>Due to sedimentation in the mini-scale reactors, <it>B. amyloliquefaciens </it>was the only species that was cultivated in 500 ml bioreactors (Infors AG, Switzerland). The cultivation volume of 250 ml was kept constant by level control. Throughout the cultivation, active mixing was achieved with a magnetic stirrer, and aeration was kept constant at two volume of air per volume of culture and minute.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Species and growth conditions</p>
            </st>
            <p>Species used in this study are listed in Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>. Frozen glycerol cultures were used to inoculate 5 ml Luria-Bertani (containing per liter: 5 g yeast extract, 10 g NaCl, 10 g tryptone) precultures, supplemented with antibiotics where necessary. From these LB precultures, we inoculated (1 to 500 diluted) 5 ml M9 minimal medium with 5 g/l glucose. From these overnight precultures, aerated Hungate tubes were inoculated at a ratio of 1 to 10. First, batch growth was allowed to proceed for 4 to 8 hours, and cultures were analyzed after continuous dilution of the medium for at least 6 volume changes at 37&#176;C. For each steady state, a new chemostat culture was started from frozen stocks.</p>
            <tbl id="T1">
               <title>
                  <p>Table 1</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Bacterial species used during this study</p>
               </caption>
               <tblbdy cols="4">
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>Species/Mutant</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>Description</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>Genotype</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>Source</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="4">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p><it>B. subtilis </it>wild type 168</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>cured of trp auxotrophy</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>trp+</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>DSM Nutritional Products Inc.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <it>B. subtilis spo0A</it>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>trp+ spo0A-</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>DSM Nutritional Products Inc.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <it>B. subtilis sigE</it>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>trp+ sigE-</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>DSM Nutritional Products Inc.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p><it>B. licheniformis </it>T218a</p>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>DSM Nutritional Products Inc.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p><it>B. licheniformis </it>T380B</p>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>DSM Nutritional Products Inc.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p><it>B. subtilis natto </it>(DSM No. 4451)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>cured of plasmids</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>bio- ade-</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>DSM Nutritional Products Inc.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p><it>B. pumilus </it>(DSM No. 27)</p>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>bio- ade-</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>DSMZ<sup>a</sup></p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <it>B. amyloliquefaciens</it>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>DSM Nutritional Products Inc.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
               </tblbdy>
               <tblfn>
                  <p><sup>a </sup>Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH</p>
               </tblfn>
            </tbl>
            <p>The M9 minimal medium was composed of the following components (per liter final volume): 5.64 g Na<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub>, 3 g KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 0.5 g NaCl, 1 g NH<sub>4</sub>Cl, 0.246 g MgSO<sub>4</sub>&#183;7H<sub>2</sub>O, 0.014 g CaCl<sub>2</sub>, at pH 7.4 and 10 ml trace element solution containing (per liter) 1.35 g FeCl<sub>2</sub>6H<sub>2</sub>O, 0.1 g MnCl<sub>2</sub>&#183;H<sub>2</sub>O, 0.17 g ZnCl<sub>2</sub>, 0.043 g CuCl<sub>2</sub>&#183;2H<sub>2</sub>O, 0.06 g CoCl<sub>2</sub>&#183;6H<sub>2</sub>O, 0.06 g Na<sub>2</sub>MoO<sub>4</sub>&#183;2H<sub>2</sub>O <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>. Filter-sterilized glucose was added to a final concentration of 1 g per liter. For <sup>13</sup>C-labeling experiments, glucose was added either as a mixture of 20% (wt/wt) U-<sup>13</sup>C-labeled isotope isomer (99%; Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Andover, MA) and 80% (wt/wt) natural glucose or as 100% 1-<sup>13</sup>C-labeled isotope isomer (99%; Cambridge, Isotope Laboratories, Andover, MA). Labeled glucose was used throughout the experiment, including the batch phase.</p>
            <p>Batch experiments were done at 250 rpm in 500 ml baffled shake flask with a culture volume of 50 ml and 5 g/L glucose for non-labeled experiments and 30 ml volume and 3 g/L glucose for labeling experiments. The medium composition and preculturing were identical to the chemostat experiments. For <it>B. subtilis </it>natto and <it>B. pumilus</it>, biotin and adenine were added from sterile stock solutions to final concentrations of 0.1 &#956;g/ml and 20 &#956;g/ml, respectively.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Analytical procedures and physiological parameters</p>
            </st>
            <p>Cell growth was monitored by determining optical density at 600 nm (OD<sub>600</sub>). Glucose and acetate concentrations in culture supernatants were determined by using refractive index (RI) and UV detectors, respectively, on a HPLC system (Agilent/Hewlett Packard Series 1100) with an Aminex HPX-87H column (Biorad, Hercules, CA).</p>
            <p>For continuous cultures, all physiological parameters were determined during steady state between 5 to 7 volume changes after inoculation. Since dilution and thus growth rate are constant in chemostat cultures, consumption and production rates were determined from the differences between substrate (S) and product (P) concentrations in the feed medium and culture supernatant. The relationship q<sub>S(or P) </sub>= &#916;S (or P) (D/X) we calculated specific production and consumption rates, where X is the biomass concentration. For determination of maintenance energy coefficients glucose consumption rates (q<sub>glc</sub>) were plotted against dilution rates. The maintenance energy coefficients were determined as the y-axis intercept of the weighted least square (WLS) regression line using the SPSS statistical software package (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL).</p>
            <p>In batch culture, the growth rate (&#956;) was determined as the coefficient of the log-linear regression of OD<sub>600 </sub>versus time. The biomass yield on the substrate (Y<sub>X/S</sub>) was determined as the coefficient of a linear regression of biomass concentration versus substrate concentration during the exponential phase. The specific substrate consumption rate was determined as the coefficient of a linear regression of substrate concentrations versus biomass concentrations multiplied by &#956;. The same relationship holds for the specific rate of formation of (by-)products.</p>
            <p>To calculate specific biomass yields, maintenance coefficients, consumption and production rates, a correlation factor for cellular dry weight (CDW) to OD<sub>600 </sub>was used. To determine the cellular dry weight, 10 ml culture broth was transferred into preweighted 15 ml glass tubes and centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 g at 4&#176;C. The pellets were washed twice with 0.9% NaCl and dried at 105&#176;C for 24 h to constant weight. Except for the <it>spo0A </it>mutant, a single correlation factor (gCDW/OD) was used for all dilution rates (D) of a given species: <it>i.e.</it>, <it>B. subtilis </it>wild type 0.48, <it>B. subtilis sigE </it>0.41, <it>B. licheniformis </it>T218a 0.55, <it>B. licheniformis </it>T380B 0.48, <it>B. subtilis </it>natto 0.54, <it>B. pumilus </it>0.61 and <it>B. amyloliquefaciens </it>0.36. For the <it>B. subtilis spo0A </it>mutant the CDW-to-OD correlation varied with the growth rate (data not shown), hence we determined the correlation factors for this mutant at dilution rates of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 h<sup>-1 </sup>from mini-scale cultivations. These values were confirmed in a 1 l working volume stirred tank reactor (data not shown). The resulting correlation factors for the <it>spo0A </it>mutant were 0.39 gCDW/OD for D of 0.05 h<sup>-1</sup>, 0.51 gCDW/OD for D of 0.2 to 0.3 h<sup>-1 </sup>and 0.44 gCDW/OD for D of 0.4 to 0.5 h<sup>-1</sup>.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Metabolic flux ratio analysis</p>
            </st>
            <p>Samples for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis were prepared as described previously <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp>. Briefly, biomass from <sup>13</sup>C-labeled chemostat cultures was harvested after stable OD<sub>600 </sub>for at least 2 volume changes (at least 6 volume changes in total). For shake flask experiments, cells were harvested during mid-exponential growth at an OD<sub>600 </sub>of 1&#8211;1.5. Cell pellets were hydrolyzed in 6 M HCl at 105&#176;C in sealed microtubes overnight. Hydrolyzates were then dried under a constant air stream at 60&#176;C. Derivatization was carried out at 85&#176;C in 30 &#956;l dimethylformamide (Fluka, Switzerland) and 30 &#956;l <it>N</it>-(<it>tert</it>-butyldimethylsilyl)-<it>N</it>-methyl-trifluoroacetamide with 1% (v/v) <it>tert</it>-butyldimethylchlorosilane (Fluka, Switzerland) for 60 min. Derivatized amino acids were analyzed on a series 8000 GC, combined with an MD 800 mass spectrometer (Fisons Instruments, Beverly, MA). The GC-MS-derived mass isotope distributions were then analyzed using the software FiatFlux <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp>. Briefly, from the mass distributions of the amino acids the <sup>13</sup>C-labeling patterns of their related precursor molecules in central metabolism were inferred. A set of probabilistic equations and the mass distributions of selected amino acid fragments were then combined to calculate the relative contribution of converging fluxes to a given metabolite pool <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p><sup>13</sup>C-constrained metabolic flux analysis</p>
            </st>
            <p>Intracellular fluxes were estimated by fitting a flux distribution to the above flux ratios and quantitative physiological data within a stoichiometric model described by <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp> using the software FiatFlux <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp>. Reaction reversibilities were chosen according to <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. The reaction matrix contained 24 unknown fluxes and 21 metabolite balances, including balances for glucose, acetate, CO<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>2</sub>, and the cofactors NADH and NADPH. Precursor requirements for biomass formation were taken from <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. To solve this under-determined system of linear equations, five additional constraints in the form of the above calculated flux ratios were used, i.e. serine derived through glycolysis, oxaloacetate originating from pyruvate, phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) originating from oxaloacetate, upper and lower bound of pyruvate originating from malate and PEP derived through the PP pathway. The sum of the weighed square residuals of the constraints form both metabolite balances and flux ratios was minimized using the MATLAB (The Mathworks) function fmincon and the residuals were weighed by dividing through the experimental error <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>. The computation was repeated at least five times with randomly chosen initial flux distributions to ensure identification of the global minimum.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Results</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Physiology and fluxes during batch growth on glucose</p>
            </st>
            <p>A desirable physiological characteristic of cell factories is rapid and fully respiratory growth. For riboflavin production, in particular, an active PP pathway is expected to be a second relevant criterion because the product is primarily synthesized from pentose units. To investigate the potential suitability of <it>B. subtilis </it>168 and four closely related bacilli as cell factories for biochemicals production, we determined their physiological parameters and fluxes during exponential growth in glucose batch cultures. The subspecies <it>B. subtilis </it>natto is phylogenetically the closest relative to <it>B. subtilis</it>, followed by <it>B. amyloliquefaciens </it>and <it>B. licheniformis</it>, while <it>B. pumilus </it>is somewhat more distal <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>The <sup>13</sup>C-flux data obtained for <it>B. subtilis </it>168 compare favorably with previously reported data from other <it>B. subtilis </it>strains <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr></abbrgrp> and also with reported metabolic flux ratios for the type strain 168 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp>. To extend flux analysis to other bacilli, we first verified their network topologies by comparison with the KEGG database <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr></abbrgrp>. All four genomes contained the genes for the reactions of the <it>B. subtilis </it>network, with the exception of an absent 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase in <it>B. pumilus </it>(Additional file <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr>). Since our labeling experiments with both [U-<sup>13</sup>C] and [1-<sup>13</sup>C] glucose demonstrated significant PP pathway fluxes also in <it>B. pumilus </it>(Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>), we assumed the presence of a 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase.</p>
            <suppl id="S1">
               <title>
                  <p>Additional file 1</p>
               </title>
               <text>
                  <p>Network comparison of <it>B. subtilis</it>, <it>B. licheniformis</it>, <it>B. amyloliquefaciens </it>and <it>B. pumilus </it>based on the KEGG database</p>
               </text>
               <file name="1475-2859-7-19-S1.xls">
                  <p>Click here for file</p>
               </file>
            </suppl>
            <suppl id="S2">
               <title>
                  <p>Additional file 2</p>
               </title>
               <text>
                  <p>flux ratios of glucose batch experiments</p>
               </text>
               <file name="1475-2859-7-19-S2.xls">
                  <p>Click here for file</p>
               </file>
            </suppl>
            <suppl id="S3">
               <title>
                  <p>Additional file 3</p>
               </title>
               <text>
                  <p>flux ratios from chemostat experiments</p>
               </text>
               <file name="1475-2859-7-19-S3.xls">
                  <p>Click here for file</p>
               </file>
            </suppl>
            <suppl id="S4">
               <title>
                  <p>Additional file 4</p>
               </title>
               <text>
                  <p>Absolute net and relative fluxes of <it>B. subtilis </it>wild type, <it>spo0A </it>and <it>sigE </it>mutants during batch cultivation</p>
               </text>
               <file name="1475-2859-7-19-S4.xls">
                  <p>Click here for file</p>
               </file>
            </suppl>
            <suppl id="S5">
               <title>
                  <p>Additional file 5</p>
               </title>
               <text>
                  <p>Absolute net and relative fluxes of <it>B. subtilis </it>at different dilution rates.</p>
               </text>
               <file name="1475-2859-7-19-S5.xls">
                  <p>Click here for file</p>
               </file>
            </suppl>
            <suppl id="S6">
               <title>
                  <p>Additional file 6</p>
               </title>
               <text>
                  <p>Absolute net and relative fluxes of different bacilli during batch cultivation</p>
               </text>
               <file name="1475-2859-7-19-S6.xls">
                  <p>Click here for file</p>
               </file>
            </suppl>
            <suppl id="S7">
               <title>
                  <p>Additional file 7</p>
               </title>
               <text>
                  <p>Absolute net and relative fluxes of different bacilli at dilution rate D 0.2 h<sup>-1</sup></p>
               </text>
               <file name="1475-2859-7-19-S7.xls">
                  <p>Click here for file</p>
               </file>
            </suppl>
            <fig id="F1">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 1</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Relative distribution of absolute fluxes in glucose batch cultures of A) <it>B. subtilis </it>wild type (top), <it>spo0A </it>(middle-top), <it>sigE </it>(middle-bottom) mutants and natto (bottom) and B) <it>B. licheniformis </it>T218a (top), <it>B. licheniformis </it>T380B (middle-top), <it>B. amyloliquefaciens </it>(middle-bottom) and <it>B. pumilus </it>(bottom)</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Relative distribution of absolute fluxes in glucose batch cultures of A) <it>B. subtilis </it>wild type (top), <it>spo0A </it>(middle-top), <it>sigE </it>(middle-bottom) mutants and natto (bottom) and B) <it>B. licheniformis </it>T218a (top), <it>B. licheniformis </it>T380B (middle-top), <it>B. amyloliquefaciens </it>(middle-bottom) and <it>B. pumilus </it>(bottom)</b>. Fluxes were determined by <sup>13</sup>C-constrained flux analysis from two separate experiments with 100% [1-<sup>13</sup>C]glucose and with a mixture of 20% [U-<sup>13</sup>C] and 80% unlabeled glucose (Additional file <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr>) along with the physiological data given in Table 2. Generally, the 95% confidence intervals were between 10 and 15% of the values shown for the major fluxes. Larger confidence intervals were estimated for reactions with low fluxes. To facilitate cross species comparison, fluxes are normalized to the glucose consumption rates given in Table 2. Arrowheads indicate flux direction.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1475-2859-7-19-1"/>
            </fig>
            <p>None of the investigated bacilli contain genes encoding enzymes of the Entner-Doudoroff pathway and absence of this pathway was also confirmed from the obtained <sup>13</sup>C-labeling patterns (data not shown). In addition to the <it>B. subtilis </it>network, the <it>B. licheniformis </it>genome contains the two glyoxylate shunt-encoding genes, which enables <it>B. licheniformis </it>to grow on two-carbon units such as acetate or 2,3-butanediol <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr></abbrgrp>. For the experiments shown here, however, we verified the absence of in vivo glyoxylate shunt fluxes from the calculated fraction of labeled CO<sub>2 </sub><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp>. This result is consistent with the normally observed glucose repression of this shunt <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>During unlimited growth on glucose, intracellular fluxes (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>) and physiology (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>) varied significantly among the investigated bacilli. The growth physiology of <it>B. subtilis </it>natto was similar to <it>B. subtilis</it>, with the obvious difference of elevated acetate secretion and a concomitantly lower TCA cycle flux. <it>B. amyloliquefaciens </it>and <it>B. pumilus </it>both grew rather slowly and were the most distinct from the others. <it>B. amyloliquefaciens </it>has the lowest biomass yield and low relative flux through the PP pathway. Moreover, its overflow metabolism is entirely different, secreting massive amounts of pyruvate instead of acetate. <it>B. pumilus </it>exhibited mostly respiratory metabolism with high relative TCA cycle fluxes. As a peculiarity, it has unusually high fluxes through the pyruvate shunt from malate to pyruvate and on to oxaloacetate that are indirectly inferred from the <sup>13</sup>C data.</p>
            <tbl id="T2">
               <title>
                  <p>Table 2</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Physiological data of glucose minimal medium batch cultures</p>
               </caption>
               <tblbdy cols="6">
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>Species</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>Growth rate</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>Yield</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>Glucose consumption rate</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>Acetate production rate</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>Pyruvate production rate</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>h<sup>-1</sup></p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>g<sub>CDW</sub>/g<sub>glc</sub></p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>mmol g<sup>-1 </sup>h<sup>-1</sup></p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>mmol g<sup>-1 </sup>h<sup>-1</sup></p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>mmol g<sup>-1 </sup>h<sup>-1</sup></p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="6">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <it>B. subtilis wild type</it>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.67 &#177; 0.02<sup>a</sup></p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.44 &#177; 0.03<sup>a</sup></p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>8.71 &#177; 0.64<sup>a</sup></p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>4.28 &#177; 0.29<sup>a</sup></p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>n/a</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <it>B. subtilis spo0A</it>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.71 &#177; 0.03</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.33 &#177; 0.02</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>11.30 &#177; 0.14</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>7.02 &#177; 0.21</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>n/a</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <it>B. subtilis sigE</it>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.67 &#177; 0.01</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.48 &#177; 0.06</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>7.90 &#177; 0.74</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>3.60 &#177; 0.08</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>n/a</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <it>B. amyloliquefaciens</it>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.32 &#177; 0.01</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.23 &#177; 0.02</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>6.05 &#177; 0.24</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>n/a</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>5.45 &#177; 0.05</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p><it>B. licheniformis </it>T218a</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.37 &#177; 0.02</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.44 &#177; 0.01</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>4.63 &#177; 0.24</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>3.03 &#177; 0.20</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.22 &#177; 0.03</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p><it>B. licheniformis </it>T380B</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.49 &#177; 0.02</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.41 &#177; 0.03</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>6.67 &#177; 0.31</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>4.17 &#177; 0.94</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.40 &#177; 0.01</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <it>B. pumilus</it>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.28 &#177; 0.02</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.33 &#177; 0.04</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>4.17 &#177; 0.33</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>1.40 &#177; 0.60</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>n/a</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p><it>B. subtilis </it>natto</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.69 &#177; 0.02</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.35 &#177; 0.05</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>10.83 &#177; 0.82</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>9.60 &#177; 1.10</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>n/a</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
               </tblbdy>
               <tblfn>
                  <p><sup>a </sup>Value refer to standard deviation from at least two independent experiments. n/a &#8211; not applicable</p>
               </tblfn>
            </tbl>
            <p>The two <it>B. licheniformis </it>strains are derivatives of the parent strain T5, a producer of thermostable alpha-amylase <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp>. Specifically, strain T380B is a sporulation-deficient, direct descendant of T218a that was obtained after multiple rounds of classical mutagenesis and screening for traits that improved alpha-amylase production. Under the investigated conditions, however, less than 10 &#956;g/ml protein was secreted in the medium, which did not significantly affect the mass balances. Both strains grow at intermediate specific growth rates with relatively high biomass yields (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>). In terms of intracellular fluxes, both <it>B. licheniformis </it>strains have about half of the TCA cycle flux of <it>B. subtilis</it>.</p>
            <p>In addition to <it>B. subtilis </it>wild type 168, we analyzed also the otherwise isogenic <it>B. subtilis </it>168 mutants <it>spo0A </it>and <it>sigE</it>. In particular, we were interested whether the frequently used <it>spo0A </it>mutation has unfavorable effects on metabolism through one of its many pleiotrophic effects rather than through the intended block of sporulation. As control for block of sporulation we used the <it>sigE </it>mutant that cannot enter stage III of sporulation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr></abbrgrp>. The phenotypic differences of <it>B. subtilis </it>wild type and <it>spo0A </it>compared to earlier work <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp> is mainly due to different cultivation systems that lead to higher growth rates in the present experiments and possibly also to differences in strain background. While the <it>sigE </it>mutation is phenotypically silent under this condition, the <it>spo0A </it>mutant has a significantly increased glucose consumption and acetate formation rate (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>). The consequence is a strongly induced overflow metabolism and hence a reduced yield of biomass (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>), indicating <it>spo0A </it>as a suboptimal choice to suppress sporulation.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Influence of growth rate on fluxes</p>
            </st>
            <p>Since most industrial processes are based on carbon source-limited fed-batches at low growth rates, we quantified growth rate dependent physiology and fluxes in 10-ml glucose-limited chemostat cultures <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp>. In contrast to the discontinuously decreasing TCA cycle flux with decreasing growth rate that was described for glucose-limited <it>E. coli </it>chemostat cultures <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp>, all ratios of intracellular fluxes in <it>B. subtilis </it>and its sporulation mutants changed continuously or remained constant with decreasing growth rates (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>). While the anaplerotic flux ratio of oxaloacetate derived from pyruvate remained almost invariant, the proportion of glycolytic versus PP pathway (serine derived through glycolysis) and the gluconeogenic flux through the PEP carboxykinase (PEP originating from oxaloacetate) increased continuously with decreasing growth rate (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>). The latter result is consistent with the notion of decreasing catabolite repression at the severe glucose limitation at low dilution rates <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <fig id="F2">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 2</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Metabolic flux ratios in glucose-limited chemostat cultures at different dilution rates of A1) <it>B. subtilis </it>wild type, A2) spo0A and A3) sigE mutant, B1) <it>B. licheniformis </it>T218a (filled symbols) and T380B (open symbols) and B2) <it>B. subtilis </it>natto (open symbols) and <it>B. pumilus </it>(filled symbols)</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Metabolic flux ratios in glucose-limited chemostat cultures at different dilution rates of A1) <it>B. subtilis </it>wild type, A2) spo0A and A3) sigE mutant, B1) <it>B. licheniformis </it>T218a (filled symbols) and T380B (open symbols) and B2) <it>B. subtilis </it>natto (open symbols) and <it>B. pumilus </it>(filled symbols)</b>. The fraction of serine derived through glycolysis and the fraction of PEP originating from oxaloacetate were obtained from 100% [1-<sup>13</sup>C]glucose. All other ratios were obtained from experiments with 20% [U-<sup>13</sup>C]glucose and 80% natural glucose. The experimental error was estimated from redundant mass distribution [20].</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1475-2859-7-19-2"/>
            </fig>
            <p>Absolute in vivo fluxes were then quantified by integrating the determined extracellular fluxes (Additional file <supplr sid="S4">4</supplr>) and the intracellular flux ratios (Additional file <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr>) by <sup>13</sup>C-constrained flux analysis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>. In contrast to the flux distribution during unrestricted growth on glucose (Figure <figr fid="F1">1A</figr>) glucose-limited chemostat cultures of <it>B. subtilis </it>show i) no overflow metabolism, ii) about doubled relative TCA cycle flux that remained stable over different dilution rates, and iii) significant gluconeogenic flux through the PEP carboxykinase at the lowest dilution rate (Figure <figr fid="F3">3A</figr>).</p>
            <fig id="F3">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 3</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Relative distribution of absolute fluxes of A) <it>B. subtilis </it>wild type at dilution rates of 0.05 h<sup>-1 </sup>(top), 0.2 h<sup>-1 </sup>(middle) and 0.4 h<sup>-1 </sup>(bottom) and B) <it>B. licheniformis </it>T218a (top), <it>B. licheniformis </it>T380B (middle) and <it>B. subtilis </it>natto (bottom) at dilution rate 0.2 h<sup>-1</sup></p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Relative distribution of absolute fluxes of A) <it>B. subtilis </it>wild type at dilution rates of 0.05 h<sup>-1 </sup>(top), 0.2 h<sup>-1 </sup>(middle) and 0.4 h<sup>-1 </sup>(bottom) and B) <it>B. licheniformis </it>T218a (top), <it>B. licheniformis </it>T380B (middle) and <it>B. subtilis </it>natto (bottom) at dilution rate 0.2 h<sup>-1</sup></b>. Fluxes were determined by <sup>13</sup>C-constrained flux analysis from two separate experiments with 100% [1-<sup>13</sup>C]glucose and with a mixture of 20% [U-<sup>13</sup>C] and 80% unlabeled glucose (Additional file <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr>) along with the physiological data of the chemostat experiments (additional files <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr> and <supplr sid="S7">7</supplr>). Generally, the 95% confidence intervals were between 10 and 15% of the values shown for the major fluxes. Larger confidence intervals were estimated for reactions with low fluxes. To facilitate cross species comparison, fluxes are normalized to the glucose consumption rates given in (additional files <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr> and <supplr sid="S7">7</supplr>). Arrowheads indicate flux directions.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1475-2859-7-19-3"/>
            </fig>
            <p>The other bacilli exhibited generally rather similar trends in their flux ratios as seen for <it>B. subtilis </it>(Figure <figr fid="F2">2A</figr> and <figr fid="F2">2B</figr>). The sole exception was the in vivo PEP carboxykinase activity (PEP from oxaloacetate) of <it>B. licheniformis</it>. While this flux ratio was high at low dilution rates but absent at higher values in all other investigated bacilli, we observed a significant but constant fraction of PEP molecules originating from oxaloacetate in both <it>B. licheniformis </it>strains. At the representative dilution rate of 0.2 h<sup>-1</sup>, we then calculated flux distributions for both <it>B. licheniformis </it>strains and <it>B. subtilis </it>natto (Figure <figr fid="F3">3B</figr>). The main differences to <it>B. subtilis </it>were the rather low respiratory TCA cycle fluxes in all three species.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>NADPH metabolism</p>
            </st>
            <p>Since the distribution of fluxes differed significantly in the investigated species, we were interested whether their catabolic NADPH formation matched the anabolic demand. For this purpose, we quantified NADPH formation from the previously quantified carbon fluxes through the NADPH-dependent reactions catalyzed by the oxidative PP pathway and the isocitrate dehydrogenase. The anabolic demand of NADPH was directly quantified from the known biochemical requirements of NADPH for growth-dependent macromolecules biosynthesis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr></abbrgrp>. Within the resolution of the analysis most <it>B. subtilis </it>strains exhibited balanced NADPH production and consumption during unrestricted growth on glucose (Figure <figr fid="F4">4A</figr>). Under glucose limitation however, there was clearly a catabolic overproduction for <it>B. subtilis </it>wild type (Figure <figr fid="F4">4B</figr>) and the two mutants (data not shown), as was reported earlier <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <fig id="F4">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 4</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Comparison of NADPH production and consumption during unrestricted (A) and glucose-limited (B and C) growth</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Comparison of NADPH production and consumption during unrestricted (A) and glucose-limited (B and C) growth</b>. Black, light gray and dark gray bars represent the estimated relative NADPH formation by the PP pathway, isocitrate dehydrogenase and malic enzyme, respectively. NADPH formation via malic enzyme is an upper bound, since all investigated species possess at least two malic enzymes with different cofactor specificities. Results from <it>B. pumilus </it>marked with an asterisk refer to a dilution rate of 0.1 h<sup>-1</sup>. Error bars represent the summed confidence of the flux estimates of the PP pathway and the TCA cycle. The white bars represent the NADPH consumption rate of biomass with errors representing the standard deviation of the experimentally determined growth rate.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1475-2859-7-19-4"/>
            </fig>
            <p>The NADPH balance was significantly different in the other bacilli. Firstly, the summed catabolic NADPH formation of both <it>B. licheniformis </it>strains was clearly insufficient to match the anabolic demand in batch and in one case also in chemostat culture (Figure <figr fid="F4">4A</figr> and <figr fid="F4">4C</figr>). This consistent catabolic underproduction was primarily caused by the rather low TCA cycle fluxes in <it>B. licheniformis</it>. Secondly, no species appeared to exhibit a catabolic NADPH overproduction like <it>B. subtilis </it>under any of the investigated conditions (data partially shown in Figure <figr fid="F4">4A</figr> and <figr fid="F4">4C</figr>). The sole exception might be the batch-grown <it>B. pumilus </it>due to its exceptionally high malic enzyme flux (Figure <figr fid="F4">4A</figr>). Since it is unclear which of the two malic enzymes with different cofactor specificities was active, however, this result is not conclusive.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Maintenance metabolism</p>
            </st>
            <p>Finally, to assess the bioenergetic suitability of the different species as biochemicals production host, we determined their maintenance metabolism; i.e. the amount of energy required to maintain cellular homeostasis in the absence of growth. Typically this non-growth-associated maintenance energy coefficient is quantified by applying Pirt's chemostat model <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr></abbrgrp>:</p>
            <p>
               <display-formula>
                  <m:math name="1475-2859-7-19-i1" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
                     <m:semantics>
                        <m:mrow>
                           <m:msub>
                              <m:mi>q</m:mi>
                              <m:mrow>
                                 <m:mi>g</m:mi>
                                 <m:mi>l</m:mi>
                                 <m:mi>c</m:mi>
                              </m:mrow>
                           </m:msub>
                           <m:mo>=</m:mo>
                           <m:mfrac>
                              <m:mi>&#956;</m:mi>
                              <m:mrow>
                                 <m:msubsup>
                                    <m:mi>Y</m:mi>
                                    <m:mrow>
                                       <m:mi>g</m:mi>
                                       <m:mi>l</m:mi>
                                       <m:mi>c</m:mi>
                                    </m:mrow>
                                    <m:mrow>
                                       <m:mi>max</m:mi>
                                       <m:mo>&#8289;</m:mo>
                                    </m:mrow>
                                 </m:msubsup>
                              </m:mrow>
                           </m:mfrac>
                           <m:mo>+</m:mo>
                           <m:msub>
                              <m:mi>m</m:mi>
                              <m:mrow>
                                 <m:mi>g</m:mi>
                                 <m:mi>l</m:mi>
                                 <m:mi>c</m:mi>
                              </m:mrow>
                           </m:msub>
                        </m:mrow>
                        <m:annotation encoding="MathType-MTEF">
 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xI8qiVKYPFjYdHaVhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9vqFj0dXdbba91qpepeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGaemyCae3aaSbaaSqaaiabdEgaNjabdYgaSjabdogaJbqabaGccqGH9aqpjuaGdaWcaaqaaiabeY7aTbqaaiabdMfaznaaDaaabaGaem4zaCMaemiBaWMaem4yamgabaGagiyBa0MaeiyyaeMaeiiEaGhaaaaakiabgUcaRiabd2gaTnaaBaaaleaacqWGNbWzcqWGSbaBcqWGJbWyaeqaaaaa@4531@</m:annotation>
                     </m:semantics>
                  </m:math>
               </display-formula>
            </p>
            <p>where <it>q</it><sub><it>glc </it></sub>is the specific glucose consumption rate, <it>m</it><sub><it>glc </it></sub>the maintenance energy coefficient and <inline-formula><m:math name="1475-2859-7-19-i2" xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:semantics><m:mrow><m:msubsup><m:mi>Y</m:mi><m:mrow><m:mi>g</m:mi><m:mi>l</m:mi><m:mi>c</m:mi></m:mrow><m:mrow><m:mi>max</m:mi><m:mo>&#8289;</m:mo></m:mrow></m:msubsup></m:mrow><m:annotation encoding="MathType-MTEF">
 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGaemywaK1aa0baaSqaaiabdEgaNjabdYgaSjabdogaJbqaaiGbc2gaTjabcggaHjabcIha4baaaaa@356A@</m:annotation></m:semantics></m:math></inline-formula> the maximum molar growth yield. Using the physiological data from the above described chemostat cultures, we found, consistent with the Pirt model, a linear dependency of the glucose consumption rate over the whole range of tested dilution rates for <it>B. subtilis </it>(Figure <figr fid="F5">5</figr>), <it>B. licheniformis </it>and <it>B. amyloliquefaciens </it>(Figure <figr fid="F6">6</figr>). For the <it>B. subtilis spo0A </it>mutant we determined growth rate specific OD<sub>600 </sub>to cell dry weight conversion factors, because they did not remain constant, in contrast to the other species.</p>
            <fig id="F5">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 5</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Specific glucose consumption rate and biomass concentration as a function of dilution rate in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of <it>B. subtilis </it>wild type 168 (A), and its <it>spo0A </it>(B) and <it>sigE </it>(C) mutants</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Specific glucose consumption rate and biomass concentration as a function of dilution rate in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of <it>B. subtilis </it>wild type 168 (A), and its <it>spo0A </it>(B) and <it>sigE </it>(C) mutants</b>. Trend lines in the left column represent the weighed least square regression. Trend lines in the right column were drawn by hand.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1475-2859-7-19-5"/>
            </fig>
            <fig id="F6">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 6</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Specific glucose consumption rate and biomass concentration as a function of dilution rate in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of <it>B. licheniformis </it>T218a (A), <it>B. licheniformis </it>T380B (B), <it>B. amyloliquefaciens </it>(C), <it>B. pumilus </it>(D) and <it>B. subtilis </it>natto (E)</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Specific glucose consumption rate and biomass concentration as a function of dilution rate in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of <it>B. licheniformis </it>T218a (A), <it>B. licheniformis </it>T380B (B), <it>B. amyloliquefaciens </it>(C), <it>B. pumilus </it>(D) and <it>B. subtilis </it>natto (E)</b>. Trend lines of A, B and C of the left column represent a weighed least square regression, all other trend lines were drawn by hand. Due to sedimentation in the 10 ml chemostats, <it>B. amyloliquefaciens </it>(C) was cultivated in actively stirred and aerated reactor with 250 ml culture volume.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1475-2859-7-19-6"/>
            </fig>
            <p>For these bacilli with linear dependencies of the specific glucose consumption rate with dilution rate, the maintenance energy coefficients were determined as the intercept of the weighted least square regression line with the y-axis (Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>). The determined coefficient of 0.39 mmol g(cdw)<sup>-1 </sup>h<sup>-1 </sup>for <it>B. subtilis </it>wild type 168 compares favorably to the previously reported 0.44 mmol g(cdw)<sup>-1 </sup>h<sup>-1 </sup>of the related <it>B. subtilis </it>wild type 1012 <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>. The <it>spo0A </it>mutant, but not the <it>sigE </it>mutant, exhibited an increased maintenance coefficient of 0.49 mmol g(cdw)<sup>-1 </sup>h<sup>-1</sup>, which is qualitatively consistent with the previously reported high maintenance energy coefficient of riboflavin-producing <it>spo0A </it>mutants of <it>B. subtilis </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr><abbr bid="B36">36</abbr></abbrgrp>. Together, these results provide strong evidence that the <it>spo0A </it>mutation has a stimulating and biotechnologically undesirable effect on maintenance metabolism.</p>
            <tbl id="T3">
               <title>
                  <p>Table 3</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Maintenance energy coefficients in different bacilli.</p>
               </caption>
               <tblbdy cols="3">
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <b>Species</b>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c cspan="2" ca="center">
                        <p>
                           <b>Maintenance coefficient</b>
                           <sup>a</sup>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c>
                        <p/>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>mmol g<sup>-1 </sup>h<sup>-1</sup></p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>R<sup>2</sup></p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="3">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p><it>B. subtilis </it>wild type</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.39 &#177; 0.08<sup>b</sup></p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.978<sup>c</sup></p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <it>B. subtilis spo0A</it>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.49 &#177; 0.06</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.976</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <it>B. subtilis sigE</it>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.33 &#177; 0.09</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.979</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>
                           <it>B. amyloliquefaciens</it>
                        </p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.35 &#177; 0.13</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.993</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p><it>B. licheniformis </it>T218a</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.30 &#177; 0.18</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.949</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p><it>B. licheniformis </it>T380B</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.20 &#177; 0.17</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="center">
                        <p>0.958</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
               </tblbdy>
               <tblfn>
                  <p><sup>a</sup>values were calculated by weighted least square (WLS) regression from data shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6; <sup>b</sup>95% confidence interval of a weight least square (WLS) linear regression analysis; <sup>c</sup>R<sup>2 </sup>represents the square of the correlation coefficient of the linear regression.</p>
               </tblfn>
            </tbl>
            <p>Both <it>B. licheniformis </it>strains and <it>B. amyloliquefaciens </it>exhibited lower maintenance energy coefficients than <it>B. subtilis </it>wild type (Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>). In most cases, however, the difference was minor and not statistically significant. The sole exception with significantly reduced maintenance energy requirements was <it>B. licheniformis </it>T380B, despite a large confidence interval. For <it>B. pumilus </it>and <it>B. subtilis </it>natto, the maintenance coefficients could not be determined because their specific glucose consumption rates did not show a linear relationship with dilution rate (Figure <figr fid="F6">6</figr>). The reasons are strong fluctuations in their steady state biomass concentrations, which, at least for <it>B. pumilus</it>, are related to dilution rates close to the maximum specific growth rate (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>).</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Discussion</p>
         </st>
         <p>The requirements for successful biotechnological production hosts are diverse and depend greatly on the product of interest. Here we characterized several important metabolic properties that are critical for biochemicals production in different bacilli: i) general growth physiology, ii) maintenance metabolism, and iii) a favorable distribution of intracellular fluxes for production of the vitamin riboflavin, including catabolic overproduction of NADPH.</p>
         <p>From a bioenergetic point of view, <it>B. subtilis </it>is not a preferred cell factory for riboflavin production because it had the highest maintenance energy requirements of all bacilli investigated here. The maintenance advantage of most other bacilli, however, was rather small and was counterbalanced by several other disadvantages such as slow growth and/or metabolism that render them even less favorable to production than <it>B. subtilis</it>. The by far best choice would be <it>B. licheniformis </it>T380B, which had only about half of the maintenance energy coefficient of <it>B. subtilis </it>wild type. Since this strain grows also robustly in different cultivation devices and shows only moderate acetate overflow, it is a promising cell factory host for biochemicals production in general, and riboflavin production in particular.</p>
         <p>Just how important are these differences in maintenance metabolism on a process scale? In fermentation for penicillin production, for example, up to 70% of the carbon source is utilized for maintenance <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B37">37</abbr></abbrgrp>. Similarly during industrial riboflavin production with the production strain RB50::pRF69, maintenance metabolism expends on the order of 45% of the consumed glucose (based on published data from <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B36">36</abbr></abbrgrp> with a maintenance coefficient of 0.67 g g(cdw)<sup>-1 </sup>h<sup>-1</sup>). Reduction of the maintenance coefficient by 50% through a host switch, for example to <it>B. licheniformis </it>T380B, seems possible as demonstrated here. Provided a similar riboflavin formation is engineered, this could reduce the glucose consumption in the overall riboflavin fed-batch process by 15&#8211;20%. Even at otherwise unaltered riboflavin titers, this constitutes a major yield improvement with high commercial relevance for a low-cost, feed chemical like riboflavin because substrate costs are the key driver in this process.</p>
         <p>Obviously, changing production hosts is a major undertaking that must be justified by the potential gains. Even within one strain line, however, maintenance metabolism can become a key process factor. Firstly, maintenance metabolism is not a constant but can be affected by various genetic manipulations. While a similar maintenance energy coefficient as reported here was described in a different <it>B. subtilis </it>wild-type (0.44 mmol g(cdw)<sup>-1 </sup>h<sup>-1</sup>), its riboflavin producing counterpart exhibited a 50% higher coefficient of 0.66 mmol g(cdw)<sup>-1 </sup>h<sup>-1 </sup><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>. This is even more surprising when considering that this particular strain was only subtly engineered; <it>i.e. </it>it contained only a single copy of the modified <it>rib </it>operon, the deregulating <it>ribC </it>mutation, and the <it>spo0A </it>mutation. A key finding in the present work is that the frequently used <it>spo0A </it>mutation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp> does not only influence the host physiology under all conditions tested, but that it is also a major contributor to increased maintenance metabolism. The riboflavin manipulations themselves do not appear to be of particular relevance because the industrial RB50 strain with its much higher production level and multiple copies of the <it>rib </it>operon in the genome as well as further uncharacterized mutations had the virtually identical maintenance coefficient of 0.67 mmol g(cdw)<sup>-1 </sup>h<sup>-1 </sup>as the above subtly engineered strain <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr><abbr bid="B36">36</abbr></abbrgrp>. Further down the sporulation regulation cascade, the <it>sigE </it>mutation, in contrast, also prevents sporulation but had no detectable physiological phenotype and a wild-type-like maintenance coefficient. It thus appears to be the preferred choice for <it>B. subtilis</it>, and this seemingly simple change in sporulation mutations has the potential to significantly decrease glucose consumption in the above mentioned riboflavin fed-batch process <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B36">36</abbr></abbrgrp> because the <it>spo0A </it>mutation alone increased the maintenance coefficient of the wild-type by 20%.</p>
         <p>The intracellular fluxes reported here for <it>B. subtilis </it>are consistent with previous reports on particular growth conditions in disparate studies <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr><abbr bid="B38">38</abbr><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr><abbr bid="B40">40</abbr></abbrgrp>. In particular, we observed absence of overflow metabolism and high relative TCA cycle fluxes in glucose-limited chemostats. In consequence, these fluxes lead to a significant excess formation of NADPH in chemostats. Compared to the other investigated bacilli, <it>B. subtilis </it>exhibited rather high respiratory TCA cycle fluxes under all conditions. At a dilution rate of D 0.2 h<sup>-1</sup>, the absolute TCA flux of <it>B. subtilis </it>was 2.9 &#177; 0.45 mmol g<sup>-1 </sup>h<sup>-1 </sup>while the maximum values of other bacilli were in the range from 1.3 &#177; 0.26 to 1.9 &#177; 0.29 mmol g<sup>-1 </sup>h<sup>-1 </sup>and thus significantly lower. As a result of their comparatively low TCA cycle fluxes, the other bacilli produced much less NADPH in the isocitrate dehydrogenase reaction. Consequently catabolic NADPH formation was either balanced or even insufficient to match the anabolic demand in all non-<it>B. subtilis </it>species. Although not a rigorous criterion like maintenance metabolism, the tendency towards catabolic overproduction of NADPH renders <it>B. subtilis </it>more attractive for riboflavin production than the other species.</p>
         <p>To balance NADPH metabolism, <it>B. subtilis </it>thus requires a transhydrogenase-like biochemical mechanism to counteract catabolic NADPH overproduction, at least in chemostat culture. Most of the other bacilli, in contrast, require the opposite mechanism, i.e. an additional supply of NADPH. How this may be achieved remains elusive at this point because these species contain no homologue of the NADPH-producing transhydrogenase PntAB of <it>E. coli </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B41">41</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Authors' contributions</p>
         </st>
         <p>SD carried out most of the experimental work, ST participated in experimental work, carried out the data analysis and drafted the manuscript, US designed and coordinated the study and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <ack>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Acknowledgements</p>
            </st>
            <p>We thank DSM Nutritional Products Inc. for providing strains and mutants for this work as well as for financial support.</p>
         </sec>
      </ack>
      <refgrp>
         <bibl id="B1">
            <title>
               <p>Microbial energetics should be considered in manipulating metabolism for biotechnological purposes</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stouthamer</snm>
                  <fnm>AH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>van Verseveld</snm>
                  <fnm>HW</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Trends in biotechnology</source>
            <pubdate>1987</pubdate>
            <volume>5</volume>
            <fpage>149</fpage>
            <lpage>155</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0167-7799(87)90010-2</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B2">
            <title>
               <p>Fed-batch versus batch fermentation</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Longobardi</snm>
                  <fnm>GP</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Bioprocess and biosystems engineering</source>
            <pubdate>1994</pubdate>
            <fpage>185</fpage>
            <lpage>194</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B3">
            <title>
               <p>Energetics of bacterial growth: balance of anabolic and catabolic reactions</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Russell</snm>
                  <fnm>JB</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cook</snm>
                  <fnm>GM</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Microbiol Rev</source>
            <pubdate>1995</pubdate>
            <volume>59</volume>
            <fpage>48</fpage>
            <lpage>62</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">239354</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7708012</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B4">
            <title>
               <p>The maintenance energy of bacteria in growing cultures</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pirt</snm>
                  <fnm>SJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Proc R Soc London Ser B</source>
            <pubdate>1965</pubdate>
            <fpage>224</fpage>
            <lpage>231</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B5">
            <title>
               <p>Developments in the use of Bacillus species for industrial production</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schallmey</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Singh</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ward</snm>
                  <fnm>OP</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Canadian journal of microbiology</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>50</volume>
            <fpage>1</fpage>
            <lpage>17</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1139/w03-076</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15052317</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B6">
            <title>
               <p>Genetic engineering of <it>Bacillus subtilis </it>for the commercial production of riboflavin</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Perkins</snm>
                  <fnm>JB</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sloma</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hermann</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Theriault</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zachgo</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Erdenberger</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hannett</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Chatterjee</snm>
                  <fnm>NP</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Williams</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
                  <suf>II</suf>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Rufo</snm>
                  <fnm>GA</fnm>
                  <suf>Jr</suf>
               </au>
               <etal/>
            </aug>
            <source>J Ind Microbiol Biotech</source>
            <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
            <volume>22</volume>
            <fpage>8</fpage>
            <lpage>18</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/sj.jim.2900587</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B7">
            <title>
               <p>Three biotechnical processes using <it>Ashbya gossypii, Candida famata</it>, or <it>Bacillus subtilis </it>compete with chemical riboflavin production</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stahmann</snm>
                  <fnm>K-P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Revuelta</snm>
                  <fnm>JL</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Seulberger</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</source>
            <pubdate>2000</pubdate>
            <volume>53</volume>
            <fpage>509</fpage>
            <lpage>516</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s002530051649</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10855708</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B8">
            <title>
               <p>Riboflavinoverproducing strains of bacteria</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Perkins</snm>
                  <fnm>JB</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pero</snm>
                  <fnm>JG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sloma</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>European patent number 0 405 370 A1</source>
            <pubdate>1991</pubdate>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B9">
            <title>
               <p>Physiology and metabolic fluxes of wild-type and riboflavin-producing <it>Bacillus subtilis</it></p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sauer</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hatzimanikatis</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hohmann</snm>
                  <fnm>HP</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Manneberg</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>van Loon</snm>
                  <fnm>AP</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bailey</snm>
                  <fnm>JE</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Appl Environ Microbiol</source>
            <pubdate>1996</pubdate>
            <volume>62</volume>
            <fpage>3687</fpage>
            <lpage>3696</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">168177</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8837424</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B10">
            <title>
               <p>A Continuous Culture Study of the Bioenergetic Aspects of Growth and Production of Exocellular Protease in <it>Bacillus licheniformis</it></p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Frankena</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Vanverseveld</snm>
                  <fnm>HW</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stouthamer</snm>
                  <fnm>AH</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology</source>
            <pubdate>1985</pubdate>
            <volume>22</volume>
            <fpage>169</fpage>
            <lpage>176</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF00253604</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B11">
            <title>
               <p>Determination of the efficiency of oxidative phosphorylation in continuous cultures of <it>Aerobacter aerogenes</it></p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stouthamer</snm>
                  <fnm>AH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bettenhaussen</snm>
                  <fnm>CW</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Archives of microbiology</source>
            <pubdate>1975</pubdate>
            <volume>102</volume>
            <fpage>187</fpage>
            <lpage>192</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF00428367</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">1156084</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B12">
            <title>
               <p>Sporulation of <it>Bacillus subtilis</it></p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Piggot</snm>
                  <fnm>PJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hilbert</snm>
                  <fnm>DW</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Current opinion in microbiology</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <fpage>579</fpage>
            <lpage>586</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.mib.2004.10.001</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15556029</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B13">
            <title>
               <p>Metabolic capacity of <it>Bacillus subtilis </it>for the production of purine nucleosides, riboflavin, and folic acid</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sauer</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cameron</snm>
                  <fnm>DC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bailey</snm>
                  <fnm>JE</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Biotechnol Bioeng</source>
            <pubdate>1998</pubdate>
            <volume>59</volume>
            <issue>2</issue>
            <fpage>227</fpage>
            <lpage>238</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980720)59:2&lt;227::AID-BIT10>3.0.CO;2-B</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10099333</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B14">
            <title>
               <p>Experimental identification and quantification of glucose metabolism in seven bacterial species</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fuhrer</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fischer</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sauer</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Journal of bacteriology</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>187</volume>
            <fpage>1581</fpage>
            <lpage>1590</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1064017</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15716428</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1128/JB.187.5.1581-1590.2005</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B15">
            <title>
               <p>Metabolic Network Analysis of <it>Bacillus clausii </it>on Minimal and Semirich Medium Using (13)C-Labeled Glucose</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Christiansen</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Christensen</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nielsen</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Metabolic engineering</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>4</volume>
            <fpage>159</fpage>
            <lpage>169</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/mben.2001.0219</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12009795</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B16">
            <title>
               <p>Comparative study on central metabolic fluxes of <it>Bacillus megaterium </it>strains in continuous culture using 13C labeled substrates</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Furch</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hollmann</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wittmann</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wang</snm>
                  <fnm>W</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Deckwer</snm>
                  <fnm>WD</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Bioprocess and biosystems engineering</source>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>30</volume>
            <fpage>47</fpage>
            <lpage>59</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00449-006-0095-7</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B17">
            <title>
               <p>The Entner-Doudoroff pathway: history, physiology and molecular biology</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Conway</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>FEMS microbiology reviews</source>
            <pubdate>1992</pubdate>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <fpage>1</fpage>
            <lpage>27</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">1389313</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B18">
            <title>
               <p>Nonlinear dependency of intracellular fluxes on growth rate in miniaturized continuous cultures of <it>Escherichia coli</it></p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nanchen</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schicker</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sauer</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source> Appl Environ Microbiol</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>72</volume>
            <issue>2</issue>
            <fpage>1164</fpage>
            <lpage>1172</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1128/AEM.72.2.1164-1172.2006</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16461663</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1392909</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B19">
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Harwood</snm>
                  <fnm>CR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cutting</snm>
                  <fnm>SM</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Molecular biological methods for Bacillus</source>
            <publisher>Chichester, England: John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</publisher>
            <pubdate>1990</pubdate>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B20">
            <title>
               <p>Metabolic flux profiling of <it>Escherichia coli </it>mutants in central carbon metabolism using GC-MS</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fischer</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sauer</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>European journal of biochemistry/FEBS</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>270</volume>
            <fpage>880</fpage>
            <lpage>891</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03448.x</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12603321</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B21">
            <title>
               <p>Determination of metabolic flux ratios from 13C-experiments and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data: protocol and principles</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nanchen</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fuhrer</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sauer</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Methods Mol Biol</source>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>358</volume>
            <fpage>177</fpage>
            <lpage>197</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">17035687</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B22">
            <title>
               <p>FiatFlux&#8211;a software for metabolic flux analysis from 13C-glucose experiments</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zamboni</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fischer</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sauer</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>BMC bioinformatics</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>6</volume>
            <fpage>209</fpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1199586</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16122385</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-6-209</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B23">
            <title>
               <p>Stoichiometric growth model for riboflavin-producing <it>Bacillus subtilis</it></p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dauner</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sauer</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Biotechnol Bioeng</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>76</volume>
            <fpage>132</fpage>
            <lpage>143</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/bit.1153</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11505383</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B24">
            <title>
               <p>High-throughput metabolic flux analysis based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry derived 13C constraints</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fischer</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zamboni</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sauer</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Anal Biochem</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>325</volume>
            <fpage>308</fpage>
            <lpage>316</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.ab.2003.10.036</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14751266</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B25">
            <title>
               <p>Phylogenetic relationships between Bacillus species and related genera inferred from comparison of 3' end 16S rDNA and 5' end 16S-23S ITS nucleotide sequences</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Xu</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cote</snm>
                  <fnm>JC</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Int J Syst Evol Microbiol</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>53</volume>
            <issue>Pt 3</issue>
            <fpage>695</fpage>
            <lpage>704</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1099/ijs.0.02346-0</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12807189</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B26">
            <title>
               <p>Knockout of the high-coupling cytochrome aa3 oxidase reduces TCA cycle fluxes in <it>Bacillus subtilis</it></p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zamboni</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sauer</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>FEMS microbiology letters</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>226</volume>
            <fpage>121</fpage>
            <lpage>126</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00614-1</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">13129617</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B27">
            <title>
               <p>Large-scale <it>in vivo </it>flux analysis shows rigidity and suboptimal performance of <it>Bacillus subtilis </it>metabolism</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fischer</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sauer</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Nat Genet</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>37</volume>
            <fpage>636</fpage>
            <lpage>640</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/ng1555</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15880104</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B28">
            <title>
               <p>KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes</p>
            </title>
            <url>http://www.genome.jp/kegg/kegg2.html</url>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B29">
            <title>
               <p>The complete genome sequence of <it>Bacillus licheniformis </it>DSM13, an organism with great industrial potential</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Veith</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Herzberg</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Steckel</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Feesche</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Maurer</snm>
                  <fnm>KH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ehrenreich</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Baumer</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Henne</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Liesegang</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Merkl</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <etal/>
            </aug>
            <source> J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <issue>4</issue>
            <fpage>204</fpage>
            <lpage>211</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1159/000079829</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15383718</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B30">
            <title>
               <p>Regulation of the glyoxylate bypass operon: cloning and characterization of iclR</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sunnarborg</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Klumpp</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Chung</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>LaPorte</snm>
                  <fnm>DC</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Journal of bacteriology</source>
            <pubdate>1990</pubdate>
            <volume>172</volume>
            <fpage>2642</fpage>
            <lpage>2649</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">208908</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">2185227</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B31">
            <title>
               <p>Stable gene amplification in chromosomal DNA of prokaryotic microorganisms</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>van Eekelen</snm>
                  <fnm>CAG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Laan</snm>
                  <mnm>Van Der</mnm>
                  <fnm>JC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mulleners</snm>
                  <fnm>LJSM</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>US patent number 6124097</source>
            <pubdate>2000</pubdate>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B32">
            <title>
               <p>Molecular cloning and expression of human IL-3</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dorssers</snm>
                  <fnm>LC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Van Leen</snm>
                  <fnm>RW</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Vos</snm>
                  <fnm>YJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wagemaker</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>European patent number EP0790307</source>
            <pubdate>1997</pubdate>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B33">
            <title>
               <p>Regulation of carbon catabolism in Bacillus species</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>St&#252;lke</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hillen</snm>
                  <fnm>W</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Annu Rev Microbiol</source>
            <pubdate>2000</pubdate>
            <volume>54</volume>
            <fpage>849</fpage>
            <lpage>880</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.849</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11018147</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B34">
            <title>
               <p>Metabolic flux analysis with a comprehensive isotopomer model in <it>Bacillus subtilis</it></p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dauner</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bailey</snm>
                  <fnm>JE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sauer</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Biotechnology and bioengineering</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>76</volume>
            <fpage>144</fpage>
            <lpage>156</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/bit.1154</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B35">
            <title>
               <p>Metabolic fluxes in riboflavin-producing <it>Bacillus subtilis</it></p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sauer</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hatzimanikatis</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bailey</snm>
                  <fnm>JE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hochuli</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Szyperski</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wuthrich</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Nat Biotechnol</source>
            <pubdate>1997</pubdate>
            <volume>15</volume>
            <fpage>448</fpage>
            <lpage>452</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/nbt0597-448</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9131624</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B36">
            <title>
               <p>Reducing maintenance metabolism by metabolic engineering of respiration improves riboflavin production by <it>Bacillus subtilis</it></p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Zamboni</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mouncey</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hohmann</snm>
                  <fnm>HP</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sauer</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Metabolic engineering</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>5</volume>
            <fpage>49</fpage>
            <lpage>55</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S1096-7176(03)00007-7</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12749844</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B37">
            <title>
               <p>Application of balancing methods in modeling the penicillin fermentation</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Heijnen</snm>
                  <fnm>JJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Roels</snm>
                  <fnm>JA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stouthamer</snm>
                  <fnm>AH</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Biotechnol Bioeng</source>
            <pubdate>1979</pubdate>
            <volume>21</volume>
            <issue>12</issue>
            <fpage>2175</fpage>
            <lpage>2201</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1002/bit.260211204</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">518966</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B38">
            <title>
               <p>Intracellular carbon fluxes in riboflavin-producing <it>Bacillus subtilis </it>during growth on two-carbon substrate mixtures</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dauner</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sonderegger</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hochuli</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Szyperski</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wuthrich</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hohmann</snm>
                  <fnm>HP</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sauer</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bailey</snm>
                  <fnm>JE</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Appl Environ Microbiol</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>68</volume>
            <fpage>1760</fpage>
            <lpage>1771</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">123836</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11916694</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1128/AEM.68.4.1760-1771.2002</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B39">
            <title>
               <p><it>Bacillus subtilis </it>metabolism and energetics in carbon-limited and excess-carbon chemostat culture</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dauner</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Storni</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sauer</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Journal of bacteriology</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>183</volume>
            <fpage>7308</fpage>
            <lpage>7317</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">95580</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11717290</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1128/JB.183.24.7308-7317.2001</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B40">
            <title>
               <p>Transcriptional and metabolic responses of <it>Bacillus subtilis </it>to the availability of organic acids: transcription regulation is important but not sufficient to account for metabolic adaptation</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Schilling</snm>
                  <fnm>O</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Frick</snm>
                  <fnm>O</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Herzberg</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ehrenreich</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Heinzle</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wittmann</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stulke</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Applied and environmental microbiology</source>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>73</volume>
            <fpage>499</fpage>
            <lpage>507</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1128/AEM.02084-06</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B41">
            <title>
               <p>The soluble and membrane-bound transhydrogenases UdhA and PntAB have divergent functions in NADPH metabolism of <it>Escherichia coli</it></p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Sauer</snm>
                  <fnm>U</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Canonaco</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Heri</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Perrenoud</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fischer</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>The Journal of biological chemistry</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>279</volume>
            <fpage>6613</fpage>
            <lpage>6619</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1074/jbc.M311657200</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14660605</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
      </refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>
